Gaining Insight into Operative Performance: Analysis of an Automated 360-Degree Feedback Tool Among Perioperative Staff

info@pdpflorida.com

305-285-8900

Give us a Call

Annals of Surgery Open

Conclusions:

“A 360-degree feedback tool is feasible, and feedback is perceived as valuable and actionable for surgeons and surgeon leaders. The intraoperative focus provided surgeons with specific feedback on how to improve within the operating room to promote efficiency, teamwork, and patient safety.”

Read the Full Article Below:

Gaining Insight into Operative Performance: Analysis of an Automated 360-Degree Feedback Tool Among Perioperative Staff

Share this post

PULSE has demonstrated a commitment to DEI projects and research. Here are a few of our efforts. PULSE created the “University of Ottawa (Canada) Diversity, Equality, and Inclusivity Survey” for their Faculty of Medicine. PULSE distributed over 6000 surveys to faculty, residents, medical students, graduate students, and support staff to understand the extent to which gender, race or ethnicity, culture or religion, sexual orientation, disability status and age relate to: teamwork, harassment, discrimination, feeling valued, civility, and promoting diversity, equitability, and inclusion. In collaboration with several large academic medical centers, PULSE has begun a study to determine whether PULSE 360 feedback provided to members of perioperative teams is affected by the member’s gender, ethnicity, age, etc. The findings as of early 2023 show no significant differences associated with demographic group membership. From the Harvard-affiliated hospitals to a large West Coast academic medical center, PULSE has either modified existing survey questions or added many additional questions to assess DEI-related concerns for individuals receiving feedback from their team members in the practice groups, clinics, departments. PULSE 360 surveys were analyzed for physicians for whom PULSE had various demographics. No significant differences were found for: gender, age, country of medical training, or native language. (Assessing Physician Performance Using 360-degree Multisource Surveys: Do Biases Exist Due to Gender, Country of Training, Native Language, and Age? Julie J Lanz, Paul Gregory, Larry Harmon; Diversity and Equality in Health and Care [2021] 18[9]: 451-456).

Gaining Insight into Operative Performance: Analysis of an Automated 360-Degree Feedback Tool Among Perioperative Staff

Gaining Insight into Operative Performance: Analysis of an Automated 360-Degree Feedback Tool Among Perioperative Staff

Annals of Surgery Open

Conclusions:

“A 360-degree feedback tool is feasible, and feedback is perceived as valuable and actionable for surgeons and surgeon leaders. The intraoperative focus provided surgeons with specific feedback on how to improve within the operating room to promote efficiency, teamwork, and patient safety.”

Read the Full Article Below:

Gaining Insight into Operative Performance: Analysis of an Automated 360-Degree Feedback Tool Among Perioperative Staff

Related Posts

How Physicians Change [using PULSE 360]: Multisource feedback driven intervention improves physician leadership and teamwork

Use of (PULSE) 360° Feedback to Develop Physician Leaders in Orthopaedic Surgery

Innovations in 360-Degree Physician Feedback Survey Programs: What HR Needs to Know

Leadership development in a professional medical society using (PULSE) 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence

Assessing Physician Performance Using 360-degree Multisource Surveys: Do Biases Exist Due to Gender, Country of Training, Native Language, and Age?